Re: [Cfrg] Call for Review on draft-kanno-secsh-camellia-00

["Henry B. Hotz" <hotz%jpl.nasa.gov@localhost>]

I also note that if ssh implements gssapi-keyex then ssh can use Camellia if Kerberos implements Camellia.  In other words, this draft is not strictly necessary (though it may be desirable).

On Apr 26, 2010, at 3:23 AM, Simon Josefsson wrote:

> Satoru Kanno <kanno.satoru%po.ntts.co.jp@localhost> writes:
> 
>> Dear List,
>> 
>> We have submitted draft of Camellia for secure shell as an individual
>> draft, because we found the Camellia patch for OpenSSH.
>> 
>> Camellia draft:
>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-kanno-secsh-camellia-00.txt
>> Camellia patch:
>> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1340
>> 
>> Comments about our document would be welcome.
> 
> Thanks for writing the document.  My comments:
> 
> 1) As you know, Camellia is patented by your organization, and you need
> to file a patent disclosure to the IETF.  The earlier disclosures
> related to Camellia are not relevant: they don't permit use for Secure
> Shell.
> 
> 2) It is not possible to implement your document without also reading
> RFC 5646, thus I believe that document has to be a normative reference.
> Alternatively, you could duplicate the necessary text.
> 
> /Simon
> _______________________________________________
> Cfrg mailing list
> Cfrg%irtf.org@localhost
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg

------------------------------------------------------
The opinions expressed in this message are mine,
not those of Caltech, JPL, NASA, or the US Government.
Henry.B.Hotz%jpl.nasa.gov@localhost, or hbhotz%oxy.edu@localhost