Re: Support for ECDSA and SHA-2 (SHA-256) in the SSHFP record

[Ondřej Surý <ondrej.sury%nic.cz@localhost>]

On 5. 9. 2011, at 13:12, Ben Laurie wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Ondřej Surý <ondrej.sury%nic.cz@localhost> wrote:
>> 
>> But the question is - is it worth updating in this particular I-D?  Isn't
>> this more an errata for RFC4255 type of update?
> 
> Yes.


Yes what? :)

Yes to update it in ECDSA I-D?

or

Yes to do an errata / bis of RFC4255?

O.
--
 Ondřej Surý
 vedoucí výzkumu/Head of R&D department
 -------------------------------------------
 CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o.    --    Laboratoře CZ.NIC
 Americka 23, 120 00 Praha 2, Czech Republic
 mailto:ondrej.sury%nic.cz@localhost    http://nic.cz/
 tel:+420.222745110       fax:+420.222745112
 -------------------------------------------