Hi Mark,
We are looking at which reference to UTF8 we should mention into the SSH UTF8 terminal mode.
[1] mentions that RFC3629 is slightly out of date and that a reference to ISO/IEC 10646:2014 may also be useful.
Is anyone aware of any deficiencies in RFC3629 fixed in ISO/IEC 10646:2014 ?
The question is whether we should have one reference or both in the draft. Unless RFC 3629 has some deficiencies fixed in ISO/IEC 10646:2014, I am incline to have only RFC3629. Is that something that
sounds reasonable to everyone ?
Yours,
Daniel
[1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secsh/current/msg01242.html
DANIEL MIGAULT
Researcher
Research
Ericsson
8500 Boulevard Decarie
H4P 2N2 Montreal, Canada
Phone +1 514 345 7900 46628
Mobile +1 514 452 2160
daniel.migault%ericsson.com@localhost
www.ericsson.com
Legal entity: Ericsson Canada Inc., registered office in Montreal. This Communication is Confidential. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set
out at
www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer