IETF-SSH archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: [Curdle] Time to Review IANA SSH Registries Policies?

To: Tero Kivinen <kivinen%iki.fi@localhost>, "Jeffrey T. Hutzelman" <jhutz%cmu.edu@localhost>
Subject: Re: [Curdle] Time to Review IANA SSH Registries Policies?
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz%akamai.com@localhost>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 02:23:08 +0000

    > identifiers without going through the registry (specifically, identifiers of
    > the form name@domain are permitted, as assigned by the owner of that domain).

It is possible to mark user%dom.ain@localhost as private/experimental and not require review. The only issue would be if such identifiers are needed for interop and the table has to be in IANA.  Is that the case?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Curdle] Time to Review IANA SSH Registries Policies?
  - From: Mouse
- Re: [Curdle] Time to Review IANA SSH Registries Policies?
  - From: Mark D. Baushke

References:
- Re: Time to Review IANA SSH Registries Policies?
  - From: Sean Turner
- Re: Time to Review IANA SSH Registries Policies?
  - From: Jeffrey T. Hutzelman
- Re: [Curdle] Time to Review IANA SSH Registries Policies?
  - From: Tero Kivinen

Prev by Date: Re: Time to Review IANA SSH Registries Policies?
Next by Date: Re: [Curdle] Time to Review IANA SSH Registries Policies?
Previous by Thread: Re: [Curdle] Time to Review IANA SSH Registries Policies?
Next by Thread: Re: [Curdle] Time to Review IANA SSH Registries Policies?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index