On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:16:36AM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 25.07.2016 09:55, Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 02:07:52AM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> >> On 24.07.2016 20:46, Amitai Schlair wrote:
> >>> On 23 Jul 2016, at 17:12, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 23.07.2016 22:45, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> >>>>> On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 06:28:26PM +0000, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> >>>>>> @@ -218,4 +224,6 @@ BUILDLINK_DEPMETHOD.readline= build
> >>>>>> .include "../../devel/zlib/buildlink3.mk"
> >>>>>> .include "../../security/openssl/buildlink3.mk"
> >>>>>> .include "../../mk/dlopen.buildlink3.mk"
> >>>>>> +# Required to detect X11BASE paths in dlopen(3) calls of _ctypes.so
> >>>>>> +.include "../../mk/x11.buildlink3.mk"
> >>>>>> .include "../../mk/bsd.pkg.mk"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This breaks the build with X11_TYPE=modular:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Do not include x11.buildlink3.mk for X11_TYPE != "native"
> >>>>
> >>>> Should be fine now. Thank you!
> >>>
> >>> This (and maybe previous as well) breaks the build on a system without
> >>> X11. Can we declare an "x11" option for lang/python27 and only apply the
> >>> intended fix when PKG_OPTIONS.x11 is enabled?
[cut]
>
> Please try this patch:
>
> http://netbsd.org/~kamil/patch-00004-python27-x11native-2.txt
>
This works on my X-less Darwin system and the package builds, but only
if I set
PKG_OPTIONS.python27= -x11
AFAIK, there is no other package that I need to explicitly choose "-x11"
for. I don't particularly like this solution. I'd rather it'd be the
opposite, like Amitai suggested above.
Andreas
--
Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri, Bioinformatics Developer (NBIS)
Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
NBIS: http://nbis.se OpenPGP: url=https://db.tt/2zaB1E7y; id=46082BDF
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature