Re: missing symlink in openoffice2-bin?

[Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost>]

Mark Davies <mark%mcs.vuw.ac.nz@localhost> writes:

> On Tuesday 21 August 2007, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb%cs.columbia.edu@localhost> writes:
>> >    cd /usr/pkg
>> >    ln -s emul/linux/openoffice.org2.2
>> >
>> > Could someone check this?  My setup is a bit odd.
>>
>> I am seeing this to, and that fixes things for me.  But, I'm not at
>> all sure what's correct.  Is there a grand plan for where Linux
>> programs live on NetBSD/i386?  Sure, libraries unpacked from suse
>> are in /emul/linux, but for example acroread7 installs under
>> /usr/pkg but not emul.  Perhaps the bug is that most of oo is in
>> emul/linux?
>
> Is this a recent change related to the new emulator framework?  I 
> haven't installed openoffice2-bin in a month or so but it has always 
> installed directly into /usr/pkg for me.

I think this behavior started with the new framework, but I'm not sure
that it's intentional.