On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 05:23:21PM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:
(maybe related to PR 42395)
On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:00:25 +0900, Joerg Sonnenberger
<joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 05:02:37PM +0200, Cem Kayali / E Ticaret ve Bilisim
Teknolojileri wrote:
Is there a specific reason to exclude *mt-d* libraries from
devel/boost-libs?
They are the default.
Yes, then PLIST of devel/boost-libs was completely changed when updated to 1.40.
Probably, need to recursive bump to rebuild packages depending on boost-libs.
Original poster wants to use old source with newer tree -- aka something
sunpported.
Joerg