Re: [PATCH] print/ghostscript-agpl with disable-compile-inits

To: Makoto Fujiwara <makoto%ki.nu@localhost>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] print/ghostscript-agpl with disable-compile-inits
From: Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 16:44:57 +0100

On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 11:51:49PM +0900, Makoto Fujiwara wrote:
> Still it's better off bumping PKGREVISION ?

I think you're right and it's probably not necessary after all, since
we've switched to destdir-by-default, so the binary package is not
built if there's extra files.

Thanks,
 Thomas

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] print/ghostscript-agpl with disable-compile-inits
  - From: Greg Troxel

References:
- [PATCH] print/ghostscript-agpl with disable-compile-inits
  - From: Makoto Fujiwara
- Re: [PATCH] print/ghostscript-agpl with disable-compile-inits
  - From: Thomas Klausner
- Re: [PATCH] print/ghostscript-agpl with disable-compile-inits
  - From: Makoto Fujiwara
- Re: [PATCH] print/ghostscript-agpl with disable-compile-inits
  - From: Thomas Klausner
- Re: [PATCH] print/ghostscript-agpl with disable-compile-inits
  - From: Makoto Fujiwara

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] print/ghostscript-agpl with disable-compile-inits
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] print/ghostscript-agpl with disable-compile-inits
Previous by Thread: Re: [PATCH] print/ghostscript-agpl with disable-compile-inits
Next by Thread: Re: [PATCH] print/ghostscript-agpl with disable-compile-inits
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index