On Fri 11 Apr 2014 at 23:45:16 +0200, Rhialto wrote: > On Fri 11 Apr 2014 at 22:27:07 +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:04:39PM +0200, Rhialto wrote: > > > The lang/clang package from the new stable branch doesn't want to work > > > for me any more. > > > > NetBSD/current? That defaults to libc++ in base as well. > > No, it's with 6.1.1. So I have I notice that the latest revisions of the package's Makefile and PLIST comment "Added libc++". http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/pkgsrc/lang/clang/Makefile.diff?r1=1.25&r2=1.26&f=h http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/pkgsrc/lang/clang/PLIST.diff?r1=1.11&r2=1.12&f=h I see in the PLIST that a whole bunch of header files is installed in include/c++/v1/, including apparently <iostream>. However, as shown upthread, the when compiling the test program, <iostream> wasn't found. And the PLIST doesn't show a libc++.* at all. When extracting the source, there are *.cpp files in .../tmp/lang/clang/work.x86_64/llvm-3.4/projects/libcxx/src. So it looks there's something missing from the configuration and installation steps. Maybe testing didn't show this if the package was installed in a -current system with libc++ installed natively. -Olaf. -- ___ Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert -- The Doctor: No, 'eureka' is Greek for \X/ rhialto/at/xs4all.nl -- 'this bath is too hot.'
Attachment:
pgpucThQWdlc0.pgp
Description: PGP signature