Matthias Ferdinand <mf+ml.pkgsrc-users%netzwerkagentursaarland.de@localhost> writes: > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 03:32:50PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: >> > # pkg_info -n libcdr | grep boost >> > boost-libs-1.60.* >> > boost-libs>=1.60.0 >> > >> > Can you please do a revbump for boost-libs? >> >> Was there actually an ABI change? Why does libcdr depend on exactly >> 1.60? > > Hi, > > I don't know enough about C++ and boost to tell if there was an ABI > change or not. The exact dependency on =1.60 probably comes from the > buildlink3.mk file, where both dependencies (=, >=) are stated. In the bl3, I see an = dependency for API, and a >= for ABI. So I don't see where the exact run-time dependency is coming from. > The problem that I have is that the clients using binary package repos > do not pick up the rebuilt packages (those which use boost-libs) because > of the missing revbump, whereas they do pick up the updated boost-libs > package itself. That results in broken dependencies in the local package > database. Sure, but the hard question is exactly what is wrong.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature