On 29.10.2019 14:52, Greg Troxel wrote: > Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost> writes: > >> On 29.10.2019 13:41, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: >>> On 29.10.2019 13:36, Greg Troxel wrote: >>>> Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost> writes: >>>> >>>>> On 29.10.2019 13:15, Greg Troxel wrote: >>>>>> Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost> writes: >>>>> In the worst case I will try to debug it myself again and switch to qt5. >>>> >>>> You should make sure that the users of the package are ok with this. >>> >> >> For the reference. I have tracked the user mentioned by Maya: >> >> 14:25 < user> [me]: hi >> 14:27 < me> user: please repeat after me if you agree: >> 14:27 < me> I am fine with fbreader switch to qt5. >> 14:28 < user> I am fine with fbreader switch to qt5, too, of course:)) >> 14:28 < user> thank you, great job! > > Great, thanks for checking. I expect most people are ok with this, and > probably all. I would just like us to be sensitive to the sense of > what people use/need and the sense of the group. > This is technically equivalent to requests to some older release of certain package. There are sometimes legitimate reasons to do so (especially on production machines). In these scenarios the proper approach is not to block development, but keeping privately older snapshot of packages (in our case pkgsrc framework).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature