nia <nia%NetBSD.org@localhost> writes: > On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 10:59:00AM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote: >> So that leads me to think that on the todo list should be: >> >> tweak iperf3 DESCR to say it's the standard approach >> >> change iperf DESCR to note that it is no longer maintained >> >> update net/iperf to the continuation fork in (3) above > > What about removing net/iperf and importing the fork as net/iperf2? > > I think if we are going to version things we should not have > the old version be the default. Yes, good point. I tend to not like churn and gradually slide into versioned, but as I see it iperf2 is now fringe and iperf3 mainstream, so the renaming pain is outweighed by the reduced confusion on normal users. I'll do this at some point.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature