Re: emacs missing module support

[Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>]

"J. Lewis Muir" <jlmuir%imca-cat.org@localhost> writes:

> I don't use emacs, but that comment for emacs-nox11 certainly goes
> against POLA to me: when I see "nox11", to me that means "does not
> require X11 to run," not "minimal."

Yesh, but "no X" and "no bloat" are kind of the same thing.   I see it
as "I want emacs on my headless server because I need it to edit config
files, adn I want as little goop as possible".   Rewmoving X toolkits is
99% of that goop.