Re: xvifX.Y vs sysctl_create() returning 22 (EINVAL)

[Christoph Egger <Christoph_Egger%gmx.de@localhost>]

On 11.01.11 17:00, Hugo Silva wrote:
> Greg Troxel wrote:
>> Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost> writes:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:29:42PM +0200, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
>>>> and making the syntax sugar change
>>>> in the middle of 5.99 is not the kind of things appreciated by
>>>> users.
>>> It's -current, I don't see this as a problem, as long as the
>>> appropriate scripts are in a pkgsrc stable branch.
>>
>> Agreed.   We are very clear that current is not stable.   We are running
>> netbsd-5 in production for xen.   Definitely this needs a note in
>> UPDATING, but this kind of breakage is a) avoided by reading UPDATING b)
>> minor/non-mysterious and c) easy to fix.   I think scripts in pkgsrc
>> stable is nice, but not strictly necessary.
> 
> 
> Completely unrelated to all this, has any progress been made in
> dom0/domU SMP? If not, would funding help? How much?

Feel free to enjoy helping out cherry%netbsd.org@localhost with Xen SMP support.

Christoph