Re: xvifX.Y vs sysctl_create() returning 22 (EINVAL)

[Hugo Silva <hugo%barafranca.com@localhost>]

Christoph Egger wrote:
> On 11.01.11 17:00, Hugo Silva wrote:
> > Greg Troxel wrote:
> > > Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost> writes:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:29:42PM +0200, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
> > > > > and making the syntax sugar change
> > > > > in the middle of 5.99 is not the kind of things appreciated by
> > > > > users.
> > > > It's -current, I don't see this as a problem, as long as the
> > > > appropriate scripts are in a pkgsrc stable branch.
> > > Agreed.   We are very clear that current is not stable.   We are running
> > > netbsd-5 in production for xen.   Definitely this needs a note in
> > > UPDATING, but this kind of breakage is a) avoided by reading UPDATING b)
> > > minor/non-mysterious and c) easy to fix.   I think scripts in pkgsrc
> > > stable is nice, but not strictly necessary.
> >
> > Completely unrelated to all this, has any progress been made in
> > dom0/domU SMP? If not, would funding help? How much?
>
> Feel free to enjoy helping out cherry%netbsd.org@localhost with Xen SMP support.
>
> Christoph

Thanks for the pointer; I mailed him.

Regards,

Hugo