Re: CVS commit: src/doc

[Perry E.Metzger <perry%piermont.com@localhost>]

itojun%itojun.org@localhost (Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino) writes:
>> I'm sorry, but I don't think that's sufficient.  It should not be
>> necessary to have to use cvs diff to find out what changed - because,
>> even then, that will only give me an idea of the differences at the
>> lowest level.  What the log should show is a high-level overview of
>> the changes that were made.
>
>       tell me what is the high-level overview which is between "cvs"
>       (which is the commit message) and below.  i can't think of one.

The right commit here would have been "note that CVS has been upgraded."

Perry

> itojun
>
>
> Index: CHANGES
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/src/doc/CHANGES,v
> retrieving revision 1.235
> retrieving revision 1.236
> diff -u -r1.235 -r1.236
> --- CHANGES   7 Dec 2003 22:55:12 -0000       1.235
> +++ CHANGES   10 Dec 2003 06:15:24 -0000      1.236
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -LIST OF CHANGES FROM LAST RELEASE:                   <$Revision: 1.235 $>
> +LIST OF CHANGES FROM LAST RELEASE:                   <$Revision: 1.236 $>
>  
>  
>  [Note: This file does not mention every change made to the NetBSD source 
> tree.
> @@ -540,3 +540,4 @@
>               tokenization routines.  [lukem 20031205]
>       sh5: Switch sh5 to the in-tree toolchain, albeit somewhat hobbled.
>               [scw 20031207]
> +     cvs(1): upgrade to 1.11.10 [itojun 20031210]
>

-- 
Perry E. Metzger                perry%piermont.com@localhost