On Nov 12, 2006, at 9:59 AM, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
thorpej%shagadelic.org@localhost wrote:Should we have a generic ETHER_ALIGN macro?I think so. (though rtl8169.c should have some flag which indicates RTL8168 quirk, which can't xfer RX packets into unaligned buffers)
So, we'd have a RE_ETHER_ALIGN(sc) macro that wraps it? Sounds good.
Maybe should we also have ETHER_PAD_LEN?
What would ETHER_PAD_LEN's semantics and usage? -- thorpej