Merging functionality of librt into libc (was: librt needs a major library bump)

[Mindaugas Rasiukevicius <rmind%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

Hello,

Andrew Doran <ad%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
> > I don't think so. librt depends on libc, so the namespace didn't change.
> 
> Agreed. On the subject of librt, it doesn't contain much and among systems
> that provide it there doesn't seem to be a common set of functionality. I'd
> like to merge it into libc and leave librt as an empty shell.

I would prefer modularisation by providing librt and libc, instead of libc,
though no strong opinion here. Any 3rd view on moving everything from librt
to libc?

-- 
Best regards,
Mindaugas
www.NetBSD.org