Re: Merging functionality of librt into libc (was: librt needs a major library bump)

To: Mindaugas Rasiukevicius <rmind%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: Merging functionality of librt into libc (was: librt needs a major library bump)
From: David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 22:20:58 +0000

On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:39:57PM +0100, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
 > I would prefer modularisation by providing librt and libc, instead of libc,
 > though no strong opinion here. Any 3rd view on moving everything from librt
 > to libc?

I think it's the path of least resistance for now, and we can/should
revisit the question when we bump the libc major.

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost

References:
- Re: librt needs a major library bump (was: CVS commit: src/lib)
  - From: Andrew Doran
- Merging functionality of librt into libc (was: librt needs a major library bump)
  - From: Mindaugas Rasiukevicius

Prev by Date: Merging functionality of librt into libc (was: librt needs a major library bump)
Next by Date: Re: CVS commit: src/usr.bin/nbsvtool
Previous by Thread: Merging functionality of librt into libc (was: librt needs a major library bump)
Next by Thread: lpd/lpr changes for foomatic
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index