Re: Rumpification (was Re: CVS commit: src/usr.sbin/envstat)

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:22:34AM +0200, Antti Kantee wrote:
> On Tue Dec 14 2010 at 14:22:50 +1100, Simon Burge wrote:
> > Was this change (including the scope of it) discussed anywhere before
> > you committed it?
> 
> Do you have an objection (apart from the one in the beginning of the
> mail where you indicated you don't like the new outlook of the code)?
> If not, consider it a fun experiment where you gain a ton of features
> for the cost of a bucket of paint.

It is quite clear that more than one person objects to random changes to
a lot of programs just for the sake of RUMP. Trying to be more
productive, why can't you take the route of either libc's namespace.h OR
explicit rump annotations using symbol renaming in the include files?

Joerg