Re: Rumpification (was Re: CVS commit: src/usr.sbin/envstat)

[Antti Kantee <pooka%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Tue Dec 14 2010 at 15:27:38 +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:22:34AM +0200, Antti Kantee wrote:
> > On Tue Dec 14 2010 at 14:22:50 +1100, Simon Burge wrote:
> > > Was this change (including the scope of it) discussed anywhere before
> > > you committed it?
> > 
> > Do you have an objection (apart from the one in the beginning of the
> > mail where you indicated you don't like the new outlook of the code)?
> > If not, consider it a fun experiment where you gain a ton of features
> > for the cost of a bucket of paint.
> 
> It is quite clear that more than one person objects to random changes to
> a lot of programs just for the sake of RUMP. Trying to be more
> productive, why can't you take the route of either libc's namespace.h OR
> explicit rump annotations using symbol renaming in the include files?

As already mentioned in the thread, with that solution you cannot define
the granularity per-call.

-- 
älä karot toivorikkauttas, kyl rätei ja lumpui piisaa