Re: [christos%netbsd.org@localhost: CVS import: src/external/mit/libuv/dist]

[christos%astron.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

In article <20200528203553.GB12361%bec.de@localhost>,
Joerg Sonnenberger  <joerg%bec.de@localhost> wrote:
>On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 06:04:23PM -0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> In article <20200527141158.GA16224%bec.de@localhost>,
>> Joerg Sonnenberger  <joerg%bec.de@localhost> wrote:
>> >----- Forwarded message from Christos Zoulas <christos%netbsd.org@localhost> -----
>> >
>> >Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 15:26:41 -0400
>> >From: Christos Zoulas <christos%netbsd.org@localhost>
>> >To: source-changes%NetBSD.org@localhost
>> >Subject: CVS import: src/external/mit/libuv/dist
>> >Reply-To: source-changes-d%NetBSD.org@localhost
>> >
>> >Module Name:	src
>> >Committed By:	christos
>> >Date:		Sun May 24 19:26:41 UTC 2020
>> >
>> >Update of /cvsroot/src/external/mit/libuv/dist
>> >In directory ivanova.netbsd.org:/tmp/cvs-serv18348
>> >
>> >Log Message:
>> >Import libuv, needed by bind-9.16.x
>> >
>> >----
>> >
>> >Why was this import not discussed before it happened? I remember quite a
>> >few concerns about the long term state of BIND and whether it wouldn't
>> >be better to drop it (potentially in favor of Unbound), so it seems
>> >somewhat rude to just import another not so small and redundant library
>> >without any discussion.
>> 
>> My fault. I did discuss it on icb and with core and people felt it was
>> easier to add libuv and keep bind. We can remove both of them in the
>> future.
>
>Well, even if it is a short-gap measure, can we at least stop installing
>it and link it internally into BIND? Others have mentioned it, but it is
>quite likely to create a lot of headache otherise.

Ok, I will make it link internally and not install it.

christos