On 10.11.2020 01:18, Mouse wrote: >>> [...] >> It's not a selling point to any regular user, born after A.D. 2000 to >> optimize reading man pages. > > (a) So what? Neither, I daresay, is, oh, say, fpr, which is still > present in 9.1.... > We might want to see fortran back. I have got no particular opinion on fpr. We still keep some cruft in src/ that predates... section 9 in man-pages and was probably never used ever since NetBSD-0.8 (otherwise it could be adapted). I planned to ask wiz@ to drop that. > (b) Are those the only people NetBSD cares about? Or the only people > you think it should care about, or some such? > Are you a user of NetBSD-current with cat-man? As I read your mail, the answer is NO. Do you plan to use recent NetBSD (10 or newer) on a resource restricted computer? As far as I can read it, the answer is NO. So far no user was witnessed in any target audience and unlikely it will change over time.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature