Re: Using NET_MPSAFE

To: Brian Buhrow <buhrow%nfbcal.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: Using NET_MPSAFE
From: Hauke Fath <hauke%Espresso.Rhein-Neckar.DE@localhost>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 08:31:05 +0200

On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 16:53:11 -0700, Brian Buhrow wrote:
> Unfortunately, npf(4) doesn't have all
> the functionality we need to implement the configurations we use.
> Consequently, it may be necessary to MP-ify pf(4) as well, as I suspect
> that's easier than implementing its functionality in npf(4).

FreeBSD has taken that route, and after my ordeal with a netbsd-{7,8} 
pf router pair I am quite happy with the result.

Cheerio,
hauke

-- 
Hauke Fath                        <hauke%Espresso.Rhein-Neckar.DE@localhost>
Ernst-Ludwig-Straße 15
64625 Bensheim
Germany

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Using NET_MPSAFE
  - From: Brian Buhrow

References:
- Re: Using NET_MPSAFE
  - From: Brian Buhrow

Prev by Date: daily CVS update output
Next by Date: Re: problems with vlan interface counters (NetBSD 8.0_BETA)
Previous by Thread: Re: Using NET_MPSAFE
Next by Thread: Re: Using NET_MPSAFE
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index