Re: Using NET_MPSAFE

[Brian Buhrow <buhrow%nfbcal.org@localhost>]

	hello Hauke.  Are you saying that pf(4) doesn't work well in
NetBSD-8_BETA?

-thanks
-Brian

On Aug 9,  8:31am, Hauke Fath wrote:
} Subject: Re: Using NET_MPSAFE
} On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 16:53:11 -0700, Brian Buhrow wrote:
} > Unfortunately, npf(4) doesn't have all
} > the functionality we need to implement the configurations we use.
} > Consequently, it may be necessary to MP-ify pf(4) as well, as I suspect
} > that's easier than implementing its functionality in npf(4).
} 
} FreeBSD has taken that route, and after my ordeal with a netbsd-{7,8}=20
} pf router pair I am quite happy with the result.
} 
} Cheerio,
} hauke
} 
} --=20
} Hauke Fath                        <hauke%Espresso.Rhein-Neckar.DE@localhost>
} Ernst-Ludwig-Stra=DFe 15
} 64625 Bensheim
} Germany
>-- End of excerpt from Hauke Fath