Re: Wireguard

[Chavdar Ivanov <ci4ic4%gmail.com@localhost>]

On Sun, 28 Mar 2021 at 09:46, Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 10:37:38AM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 08:39:15PM +0000, Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
> > > In the light of the recent Wireguard vs. FreeBSD 13 shenanigans, what
> > > is the present thinking about the in-kernel NetBSD implementation?
> > >
> > > I beg your pardon if I have missed some discussion here or elsewhere.
> >
> > Since I had to look this up, here's a link to an article about this:
> >
> > https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/03/buffer-overruns-license-violations-and-bad-code-freebsd-13s-close-call/
>
> Note that our in-tree wg(4) implementation has nothing in common with neither
> the FreeBSD nor the OpenBSD code.

I did follow the discussions back then; I remember there were some
reservations by the original author, but didn't find out if it were
due to potential problems he had seen or due to the fact that the
implementation was unconnected with him.

>
> Martin



-- 
----