Re: Raidframe performances (was: Re: NFS performances)

[Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>]

On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 01:04:42PM +0000, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> [...]
> But the difference is not obvious:
> twa0 at pci2 dev 7 function 0: 3ware 9550SX series (rev. 0x00)
> twa0: interrupting at ioapic1 pin 2
> twa0: 12 ports, Firmware FE9X 3.08.00.016, BIOS BE9X 3.08.00.004
> twa0: Monitor BL9X 3.01.00.006, PCB Rev 032 , Achip 1.70    , Pchip 1.60
> 
> twa1 at pci2 dev 8 function 0: 3ware 9550SX series (rev. 0x00)
> twa1: interrupting at ioapic1 pin 3
> twa1: 12 ports, Firmware FE9X 3.08.00.016, BIOS BE9X 3.08.00.004
> twa1: Monitor BL9X 3.01.00.006, PCB Rev 032 , Achip 1.70    , Pchip 1.60

battery backup status, maybe ?
The driver will eventually print informations about this, for example:
twa1: AEN 0x0055: INFO: Battery charging started: 
twa1: AEN 0x0056: INFO: Battery charging completed: 

tw_cli should also be able to print it, if you have it.

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--