Re: pkg/40039 (sysutils/hal compilation errors (NetBSD 4.0))

[Robert Elz <kre%munnari.OZ.AU@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR pkg/40039; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Robert Elz <kre%munnari.OZ.AU@localhost>
To: "Jared D. McNeill" <jmcneill%netbsd.org@localhost>
Cc: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, pkgsrc-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: pkg/40039 (sysutils/hal compilation errors (NetBSD 4.0)) 
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:51:27 +0700

     Date:        Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:06:35 -0500
     From:        "Jared D. McNeill" <jmcneill%netbsd.org@localhost>
     Message-ID:  
<41d6f0b90811290606y7f2fd974ye47795a5f8ab834e%mail.gmail.com@localhost>
 
   | Does the following patch work for you?
 
 Yes, that looks fine.  Or more accurately, the content of the patch
 looks fine, for reasons that I didn't bother to try to understand my
 patch program (standard NetBSD version from a while ago) didn't like
 the format of the patch, so I just applied it manually.  With that
 the package built fine.
 
 I have no idea why my brain fixated on the var name being LIST_SRC instead of 
 PLIST_SRC - obviously I used he correct one when I tested my version of
 the fix...
 
 And lastly, while I'm here, when the package built, it told me ...
 
 The following files should be created for hal-0.5.11nb10:
 
         /usr/pkg/etc/dbus-1/system.d/hal.conf (m=0644)
             [/usr/pkg/share/examples/hal/hal.conf]
 
 (and /etc/rc.d/hal but that one is fine).   That looks incorrect, I
 have PKG_SYSCONFBASE set, so /usr/pkg/etc isn't where conf files should
 be placed.   I see no use of the CONF_FILES mechanism in hal's Makefile,
 so I assume it hasn't been made to deal with PKG_SYSCONFDIR yet?
 
 kre
 
 ps: I deleted gnats-admin from the list of recipients of this message.