Re: pkg/56163: Solaris 10 support for GNU ld, missing library path

[David Holland <dholland-pbugs%netbsd.org@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR pkg/56163; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: David Holland <dholland-pbugs%netbsd.org@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: pkg/56163: Solaris 10 support for GNU ld, missing library path
Date: Sun, 22 May 2022 23:19:16 +0000

 On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 04:30:02PM +0000, Claes N?st?n wrote:
  >  >  I'm pretty sure we can just use COMPILER_LIB_DIRS for this as intended, 
  >  >  rather than duplicating all the logic for each platform, i.e.:
  >  >  
  >  >     --- a/devel/binutils/Makefile
  >  >     +++ b/devel/binutils/Makefile
  >  >     @@ -25,9 +25 @@ GNU_CONFIGURE_STRICT=   no
  >  >     -# Standard lib dirs on RHEL are named *lib64
  >  >     -LIB_PATH=              /lib:/usr/lib
  >  >     -.if exists(/usr/lib64)
  >  >     -LIB_PATH:=             /usr/lib64:${LIB_PATH}
  >  >     -.endif
  >  >     -.if exists(/lib64)
  >  >     -LIB_PATH:=             /lib64:${LIB_PATH}
  >  >     -.endif
  >  >     -CONFIGURE_ARGS+=       --with-lib-path=${LIB_PATH}
  >  >     +CONFIGURE_ARGS+=       --with-lib-path=${COMPILER_LIB_DIRS:S/ /:/Wg}
  >  >  
  >  >  Untested though, as I never use gld on SunOS.
  >  >  
  >  
  >  Tried it out and seems to be working fine on my Ultra 40 running
  >  Solaris 10. (and, gld is used as the equivalent patch of what OS-1551
  >  fixed is not on my system)
 
 Can someone check that this doesn't explode on Linux? It hasn't been
 committed but if it doesn't cause fallout it should be.
 
 -- 
 David A. Holland
 dholland%netbsd.org@localhost