pkgsrc-WIP-discuss archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: New packages and question about BUILDLINK_DEPENDS
- To: Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost>
- Subject: Re: New packages and question about BUILDLINK_DEPENDS
- From: Aron Stansvik <elvstone%gmail.com@localhost>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 02:51:00 +0200 See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Report problems to http://sf.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=1&atid=200001 0.0 RCVD_BY_IP Received by mail server with no name
2005/9/15, Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost>:
> The value in the bl3 file is what a depending package will require if
> the depending package author (pkgsrc author) doesn't specify one. So
> the art is choosing the right value for this unknown set. So if
> there's a real release post the May API change, I'd pick that.
Okay, I see. But there's no real release after the May API change,
only betas, the next release after the May API change will be the
future 1.4.0 release I guess (which isn't likely to break API with its
betas, but I can't say for sure). Maybe I should just use "1.4.0" and
be done with it, eventhough the final 1.4.0 is not released yet.. hm,
tricky I think ;)
Thanks for your advice,
Aron
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server.
Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very
own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
pkgsrc-wip-discuss mailing list
pkgsrc-wip-discuss%lists.sourceforge.net@localhost
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-discuss
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index