pkgsrc-WIP-discuss archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: New packages and question about BUILDLINK_DEPENDS
- To: Aron Stansvik <elvstone%gmail.com@localhost>
- Subject: Re: New packages and question about BUILDLINK_DEPENDS
- From: Geert Hendrickx <geert.hendrickx%ua.ac.be@localhost>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 09:10:40 +0200 See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Report problems to http://sf.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=1&atid=200001 1.0 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 12:32:09AM +0200, Aron Stansvik wrote:
> I'm a little unsure if having the dependency on "1.4.0.b5" instead of
> just "1.4.0" will mess up when libmemcache 1.4.0 becomes the final
> "1.4.0".
I think it will. So use >=1.4.0 if it's necessary, but simply use
libmemcache if the version is not that important.
GH
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server.
Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very
own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
pkgsrc-wip-discuss mailing list
pkgsrc-wip-discuss%lists.sourceforge.net@localhost
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-discuss
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index