Re: New packages and question about BUILDLINK_DEPENDS

[Aron Stansvik <elvstone%gmail.com@localhost>]

2005/9/15, Thomas Klausner <thomasklausner%users.sourceforge.net@localhost>:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 12:13:21PM +0200, Aron Stansvik wrote:
> > Okay. Anyone else know of a more "correct" way to do this?
> >
> > I'm thinking maybe I should use >=1.4.0 intially after all, and when
> > 1.4.0 is really released, if the API has been broken (unlikely), I'll
> > bump the PKGREVISION to 1 and change the buildlink3.mk to pull in
> > memcache>=1.4.0nb1, to force any dependants (that will probably still
> > be only lighttpd) to update themselves.
> 
> Actually, I'd suggest a slightly different way:  Since 1.4.0.b5 is
> a higher dewey number than 1.4.0, but is a lower version number,
> I'd set PKGNAME to libmemcache-1.3.99 and then depend on that
> version. If 1.4.0 breaks the API, just bump the dependency.
> 
> I don't think there's any use in depending on versions that have
> never been in pkgsrc. And I don't like "libmemcache>" without a
> version number at all -- it's bound to break something :)

Good idea, I'll go with it. Thanks!

Aron


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server.
Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very
own Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
pkgsrc-wip-discuss mailing list
pkgsrc-wip-discuss%lists.sourceforge.net@localhost
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-discuss