pkgsrc-WIP-discuss archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: wip/libassa
- To: Roland Illig <rillig%NetBSD.org@localhost>
- Subject: Re: CVS commit: wip/libassa
- From: "Jeremy C. Reed" <reed%reedmedia.net@localhost>
- Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 08:18:20 -0700 (PDT) See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Report problems to http://sf.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=1&atid=200001
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Roland Illig wrote:
> > I was confused about building process wip/granule under pkgsrc-2006Q1
> > when BUILDLINK_API_DEPENDS is set instead of BUILDLINK_DEPENDS (I mean
> > that under pkgsrc-2006Q1 it no build at all). After I'd received your
> > email I found CVS commit message with changes BUILDLINK_DEPENDS ->
> > BUILDLINK_API_DEPENDS, and I noticed that this changes has made after
> > pkgsrc-2006Q1 has been branched. It seems that I should replace it again.
>
> Thanks for the explanation. In my opinion it should be possible to use
> pkgsrc-wip together with the latest stable branch of pkgsrc. I've forwarded
> the issue to tech-pkg.
This had already been discussed before.
The work-in-progress follows the current pkgsrc (as seen with many other
changes too).
As a work-around, simply use both variables for your own pkgsrc-wip needs.
(That may work for this issue, but maybe not for others.)
Jeremy C. Reed
echo ':6DB6=88>?;@69876tA=AC8BB5tA6487><' | tr '4-F' 'wu rofIn.lkigemca'
-------------------------------------------------------
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
pkgsrc-wip-discuss mailing list
pkgsrc-wip-discuss%lists.sourceforge.net@localhost
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-discuss
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index