Re: pkgsrc: wip/{audacious,audacious-plugins}

[Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost>]

Johann Franz <jfranz%bsdprojects.net@localhost> writes:

> Do we have an official guideline on what goes into pkgsrc-wip? Thanks
> for the detailed explanation, but I fear it'll get lost in the
> archives.  Unlike GIMP, Audacious' release process seems to proceed at
> a very fast pace, so I figure a seperate -devel package wouldn't be
> too prolific.

There are no real guidelines, other than normal pkgsrc rules and that
non-developers can commit.

I don't see what fast has to do with it.  If the latest stable is
packaged, and perhaps also an unstable version, then stable gets updated
on new declaration and unstable often.

> I'm not going to downgrade only to upgrade it again in a few days. 
> If anyone wants to do so, please go ahead and take the maintainership. 

> Same for the splitting up of the plug-ins/modules into seperate packages.

Perhaps add a comment in plug-ins about this.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
pkgsrc-wip-review mailing list
pkgsrc-wip-review%lists.sourceforge.net@localhost
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-review