DESCR should mention GPL in passing; a library intended to be usable in embedded products being GPL is not what I'd expect. (I don't mean to object to someone writing and distributing a library, or to it being packaged. I would just expect that most actual products would rule it out, so it seems good to add "GPL-licensed" to the DESCR (not to be pointed; just add the words so people perceive reality efficiently). pkglint complains: ERROR: patches/patch-Makefile:1: "$NetBSD$" expected. ERROR: patches/patch-Makefile:1: Comment expected. Is PKGSRC_RUN_TEST documented in the guide? I have been unclear on how this is supposed to work, but it seems sensible. Why is REPLACE_PERL outside of ifdef while USE_TOOLS is in? It probably needs FETCH_USING=curl due to https; it won't fetch for me.
Attachment:
pgpMjRWkeeGY_.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
_______________________________________________ pkgsrc-wip-review mailing list pkgsrc-wip-review%lists.sourceforge.net@localhost https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-review