Port-hpcsh archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
NetBSD 4.0 release config
I'm just trying to cross-compile a new hpcsh kernel using the NetBSD
4.0 release sources on an i386 machine. It works fine if I use the
default GENERIC config that comes with 4.0, but it won't handle some
of the options I had in my previous (3.99.8) kernel. Here is a diff
between the version that worked (i.e., with the offending options
commented out), and the version I would have liked to compile.
132c132
< file-system SMBFS # experimental - CIFS; also needs nsmb
(below) - uncomment jmw
---
#file-system SMBFS # experimental - CIFS; also needs nsmb (below)
- uncomment jmw
163,168c163,168
< options NFS_BOOT_BOOTSTATIC
< options NFS_BOOTSTATIC_MYIP="\"192.168.0.165\""
< #options NFS_BOOTSTATIC_GWIP "1.2.3.254"
< #options NFS_BOOTSTATIC_MASK "255.255.255.0"
< options NFS_BOOTSTATIC_SERVADDR="\"192.168.0.162\""
< options NFS_BOOTSTATIC_SERVER="\"hpnetbsd:/honk/export/680current_nfs\""
---
#options NFS_BOOT_BOOTSTATIC
#options NFS_BOOTSTATIC_MYIP="\"192.168.0.165\""
##options NFS_BOOTSTATIC_GWIP "1.2.3.254"
##options NFS_BOOTSTATIC_MASK "255.255.255.0"
#options NFS_BOOTSTATIC_SERVADDR="\"192.168.0.162\""
#options NFS_BOOTSTATIC_SERVER="\"hpnetbsd:/honk/export/680current_nfs\""
337c337
< pseudo-device irframetty # IrDA frame line discipline
---
#pseudo-device irframetty # IrDA frame line discipline
344c344
< pseudo-device nsmb # experimental - SMB requester -
uncommented jmw
---
#pseudo-device nsmb # experimental - SMB requester -
uncommented jmw
You see that the options build.sh didn't like (because it couldn't
find the corresponding *.c source files) were for smbfs support,
static boot support, and irda support. Is the fact that these don't
work anymore intentional, or were these sources somehow inadvertently
omitted? I'm particularly keen on getting the smbfs support going,
and also the static boot. I never actually used the IRDA support,
though I had included it in my kernel config, so I haven't really even
verified for myself that it works.
Any advice would be appreciated here.
Is anyone else running 4.0 release on a Jornada 680/690?
Thanks,
Mike
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index