Port-i386 archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Eee PC 900 vs 901, from the NetBSD user point of view

To: port-i386%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: Eee PC 900 vs 901, from the NetBSD user point of view
From: Dennis den Brok <d.den.brok%uni-bonn.de@localhost>
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 14:59:51 +0000 (UTC)

Joel CARNAT <joel%carnat.net@localhost> schrieb:
> Dealing with CPU speed and battery life, I guess the CPU (Celeron-M) can
> be software slowed down. I read that you can use the 701 battery with the
> 900, and also found 6-cells battery for the 900.

I'm quite sure that Celerons don't support SpeedStep.

--
Dennis den Brok

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Eee PC 900 vs 901, from the NetBSD user point of view
  - From: Nino on NetBSD 4.0
- Re: Eee PC 900 vs 901, from the NetBSD user point of view
  - From: Paul de Weerd

References:
- Eee PC 900 vs 901, from the NetBSD user point of view
  - From: Joel CARNAT

Prev by Date: Re: Eee PC 900 vs 901, from the NetBSD user point of view
Next by Date: Re: Eee PC 900 vs 901, from the NetBSD user point of view
Previous by Thread: Re: Eee PC 900 vs 901, from the NetBSD user point of view
Next by Thread: Re: Eee PC 900 vs 901, from the NetBSD user point of view
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index