Re: Eee PC 900 vs 901, from the NetBSD user point of view

["Nino on NetBSD 4.0" <nbsdold%gmx.net@localhost>]

I thought so, too... but on FreeBSD, I actually COULD do it... I don't know 
whether that really was physical speedstepping, but the main effect was that 
the cooler was substantially quieter and the machine a bit more sluggish... May 
be personal perception, though.

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 14:59:51 +0000 (UTC)
> Von: Dennis den Brok <d.den.brok%uni-bonn.de@localhost>
> An: port-i386%netbsd.org@localhost
> Betreff: Re: Eee PC 900 vs 901, from the NetBSD user point of view

> Joel CARNAT <joel%carnat.net@localhost> schrieb:
> > Dealing with CPU speed and battery life, I guess the CPU (Celeron-M) can
> > be software slowed down. I read that you can use the 701 battery with
> the
> > 900, and also found 6-cells battery for the 900.
> 
> I'm quite sure that Celerons don't support SpeedStep.
> 
> --
> Dennis den Brok

-- 
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört?
Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger