Re: Issues with Netatalk and MACE

[David Riley <fraveydank%gmail.com@localhost>]

The network behaves fine otherwise; it's running headless and I generally use 
SSH to control it (though I can view the console over serial).  Doesn't seem 
too slow at all.

I probably have an 8139 hanging around somewhere, since they were all the rage 
(and came free in a box of cracker jacks) when this thing was reaching its 
golden years.  I'll give that a try.



On Jul 9, 2010, at 6:30 PM, Michael wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hello,
> 
> On Jul 9, 2010, at 1:48 PM, David Riley wrote:
> 
>> I feel like I'm probably going about this the totally wrong way.  Does 
>> anyone else have Netatalk with atalkd running successfully on a MACE 
>> machine?  I'm running 5.0.2 basically stock (with a slightly modified 
>> GENERIC kernel).
> 
> Does the network interface work right otherwise? I remember trouble with some 
> MACEs that never got fixed ( IIRC it would go VERY slow and lose packets left 
> and right ). There were commits years ago which made it work for most people 
> ( including me ) but apparently not everyone.
> If you have a PCI NIC sitting around you may want to give it a try.
> 
> have fun
> Michael
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
> 
> iQEVAwUBTDei7MpnzkX8Yg2nAQLHGggAiEHxD+es9Gk+uP4RK233V5Voy/l5TTDi
> opbimOcv/QRY3q1WIHN+BcwXEJF3GDmFsgcv+lf/QYS8o2HhA+4Vdt6o1nPjqn1I
> 2me1mcEXitHWSpkiEyg1hZGksdRRs43L9Ry+nrI23lsiOqFAVjYuIJ9joBQBmvmS
> lnnFjGua5iiLBDle90+s+RcMMcBitAVGExHqg2ZFu/b5nfzQgEsh9QAion607Xrp
> N66397eL6DGJ56S3w6pg57f19eS7NoAueZPeACyubBO9lNYKiTtIygLR03bDhMzA
> R33jSm4veHwljqnTkLO9sWkQZZI8zU3DI3nAAY8N3E1caxC/IKiqQg==
> =x7r+
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----