Port-vax archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: [DOC] Expected build times (was: my simh -current build completed.)



On Thu, 2024-02-01 19:53:15 +0000, John Klos <john%klos.com@localhost> wrote:
> A ./build.sh -x tools distribution sets on one core of an amd64 system took
> 8711.28 real. If that was 344 times faster than a 4000/60, then the 4000/60
> should take around 34.7 days. My build has been running since 25-December,
> but an accidental break on the serial caused it to lose three or four days,
> so that's around 33 days.

My CI script always tries tools, libs, release, iso-image,
install-image, live-image as separate steps without X11 (except
zaurus/earm, which needs it for the install-/live-image).
> 
> Does that mean my amd64 system (Ryzen 5900X) is 1.7 times faster than
> yours? ;)

The VAX builds usually take about 5h wall time. That host is a
HP ProLiant DL360e Gen8, 2x E5-2450L, 64 GB RAM, 3 TB HDD. Would be
nice to have a really modern system, but that came from my employer
and was just around for free. (5h here also implies that I usually run
14 jobs in parallel overall.)

> I know our math is completely based on the wrong kind of measurements, but
> it's fun to wonder.

lol :)  So yes, your box is (at least) 1.7 to 2 times faster.

MfG, JBG

-- 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index