Source-Changes-D archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: src/sys/fs/tmpfs
Am 10.05.11 02:34, schrieb Matt Thomas:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: matt
> Date: Tue May 10 00:34:26 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/fs/tmpfs: tmpfs_vnops.c
>
> Log Message:
> yes, more C99 please (back out previous change).
After this committ/back-out/back-out-pf-the-back-out fest I have a
technical question:
What is the current state of C99 vs. older Cs? Do all arches /
compilers we have support C99? I assume gcc, llvm/clang are safe, but
what about pcc wrt C99?
I'd like a short clarification here, since this might influence my
coding... tnx.
>
>
> To generate a diff of this commit:
> cvs rdiff -u -r1.79 -r1.80 src/sys/fs/tmpfs/tmpfs_vnops.c
>
> Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the
> copyright notices on the relevant files.
>
>
>
>
> Modified files:
>
> Index: src/sys/fs/tmpfs/tmpfs_vnops.c
> diff -u src/sys/fs/tmpfs/tmpfs_vnops.c:1.79
> src/sys/fs/tmpfs/tmpfs_vnops.c:1.80
> --- src/sys/fs/tmpfs/tmpfs_vnops.c:1.79 Sun May 8 00:03:35 2011
> +++ src/sys/fs/tmpfs/tmpfs_vnops.c Tue May 10 00:34:26 2011
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -/* $NetBSD: tmpfs_vnops.c,v 1.79 2011/05/08 00:03:35 christos Exp $
> */
> +/* $NetBSD: tmpfs_vnops.c,v 1.80 2011/05/10 00:34:26 matt Exp $ */
>
> /*
> * Copyright (c) 2005, 2006, 2007 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc.
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <sys/cdefs.h>
> -__KERNEL_RCSID(0, "$NetBSD: tmpfs_vnops.c,v 1.79 2011/05/08 00:03:35
> christos Exp $");
> +__KERNEL_RCSID(0, "$NetBSD: tmpfs_vnops.c,v 1.80 2011/05/10 00:34:26 matt
> Exp $");
>
> #include <sys/param.h>
> #include <sys/dirent.h>
> @@ -1466,8 +1466,7 @@
>
> #if defined(DEBUG)
> if (!error && pgs) {
> - int i;
> - for (i = 0; i < npages; i++) {
> + for (int i = 0; i < npages; i++) {
> KASSERT(pgs[i] != NULL);
> }
> }
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index