Re: Upgrading in-tree OpenSSL to 0.9.9-current

[nathanw%MIT.EDU@localhost (Nathan J. Williams)]

"Steven M. Bellovin" <smb%cs.columbia.edu@localhost> writes:

> On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:38:12 -0400
> Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%rek.tjls.com@localhost> wrote:
>
>> I figure, it's NetBSD-current, so including OpenSSL-current is not
>> such a big deal.  And I will try to keep up to date as there are
>> major changes in OpenSSL through 0.9.9 -- if in fact there are any.
>> 
>> Opinions?
>> 
> Makes sense to me -- it is, as you say, -current.

I don't have any particular problem with Thor's plan, but this general
line of reasoning seems wrong; we'll want to release at some point,
and then it could become kind of annoying to ship a non-released
version of OpenSSL.

        - Nathan