Re: Upgrading in-tree OpenSSL to 0.9.9-current

["Steven M. Bellovin" <smb%cs.columbia.edu@localhost>]

On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:38:16 -0400
nathanw%MIT.EDU@localhost (Nathan J. Williams) wrote:

> "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb%cs.columbia.edu@localhost> writes:
> 
> > On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:38:12 -0400
> > Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%rek.tjls.com@localhost> wrote:
> >
> >> I figure, it's NetBSD-current, so including OpenSSL-current is not
> >> such a big deal.  And I will try to keep up to date as there are
> >> major changes in OpenSSL through 0.9.9 -- if in fact there are any.
> >> 
> >> Opinions?
> >> 
> > Makes sense to me -- it is, as you say, -current.
> 
> I don't have any particular problem with Thor's plan, but this general
> line of reasoning seems wrong; we'll want to release at some point,
> and then it could become kind of annoying to ship a non-released
> version of OpenSSL.
> 
And the odds of us shipping before they do?


                --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb