tech-embed archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.

To: "Zafer Aydogan" <zafer%gmx.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
From: "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 08:48:32 -0400

On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 14:36:44 +0200 (MEST)
"Zafer Aydogan" <zafer%gmx.org@localhost> wrote:
> > several commercial products using NetBSD or based upon it?)
> > 
> Name one.

http://www.netbsd.org/gallery/products.html

Oops.  You said just one.  Sorry.

-- 
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy%NetBSD.org@localhost>
http://www.NetBSD.org/

References:
- Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
  - From: Timo Schoeler
- Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
  - From: Zafer Aydogan

Prev by Date: Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
Next by Date: Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
Previous by Thread: Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
Next by Thread: Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index