Re: rfc: C99 style of the uintN_t types

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 02:41:45PM +0400, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote:
> I think there's no pressing need to go to c99 types that would warrant
> a bulk conversion.

At least for libc a careful check of all u_short uses should be done.
Most of them should be uint16_t.

Joerg