tech-kern by date

Last updated: Sun Aug 04 15:53:06 2013
Messages in reverse chronological order
Timezone is UTC

Page 1 of 2008/08
[Prev Page] [Newest Page] [Oldest Page] [Next Page]

TimeSubject# followupsFrom
Fri, 15 Aug 2008
08:49 Re: Xen 3.3: Problem HVM guest (1) Christoph Egger
08:18 Re: Xen 3.3: Problem HVM guest (1) Christoph Egger
Thu, 14 Aug 2008
22:51 Re: couple sysctl(9) questions (1) Quentin Garnier
22:15 couple sysctl(9) questions (1) Jeremy C. Reed
21:39 Re: Xen 3.3: Problem HVM guest (3) Christoph Egger
21:09 Re: Xen 3.3: Problem HVM guest (0) Christoph Egger
19:09 Re: Idea wanted; block disk on network (SC101T) (0) David Young
18:30 Re: Xen 3.3: Problem HVM guest (1) Manuel Bouyer
18:25 Re: Xen 3.3: Problem HVM guest (1) Christoph Egger
17:48 Re: Xen 3.3: Problem HVM guest (1) Manuel Bouyer
17:10 Re: Xen 3.3: Problem HVM guest (1) Christoph Egger
17:05 Re: Xen 3.3: Problem HVM guest (2) Manuel Bouyer
16:57 Re: Xen 3.3: Problem HVM guest (2) Christoph Egger
16:55 Re: Xen 3.3: Problem HVM guest (1) Manuel Bouyer
16:50 Re: Xen 3.3: Problem HVM guest (1) Christoph Egger
16:34 Re: Xen 3.3: Problem HVM guest (1) Manuel Bouyer
16:27 Re: Xen 3.3: Problem HVM guest (1) Christoph Egger
15:40 Re: [PATCH] UFS: implement some path configuration (0) Andy Shevchenko
15:37 [PATCH] UFS: implement some path configuration con (1) Andy Shevchenko
15:32 Re: [PATCH] a character device counting kernel pag (0) Simon Burge
14:58 Re: [PATCH] a character device counting kernel pag (0) Matt Thomas
14:50 Re: [PATCH] a character device counting kernel pag (0) Steven M. Bellovin
14:40 Re: Xen 3.3: Problem HVM guest (0) Manuel Bouyer
14:38 Re: Xen 3.3: Problem HVM guest (1) Manuel Bouyer
14:36 Re: [PATCH] a character device counting kernel pag (1) Quentin Garnier
14:35 Re: Xen 3.3: Problem HVM guest (1) Christoph Egger
14:32 Re: Xen 3.3: Problem HVM guest (1) Manuel Bouyer
14:28 Re: Xen 3.3: Problem HVM guest (2) Christoph Egger
14:01 [PATCH] a character device counting kernel pages (3) Ilya Dogolazky
13:52 Re: Xen 3.3: Problem HVM guest (1) Manuel Bouyer
12:11 Re: GSoC Subfile Status Update (0) Adam Burkepile
11:59 Re: Xen 3.3: Problem HVM guest (1) Christoph Egger
11:38 Re: GSoC Subfile Status Update (1) Hubert Feyrer
07:37 GSoC Subfile Status Update (1) Adam Burkepile
06:18 Re: rfc: C99 style of the uintN_t types (0) Andy Shevchenko
02:50 Re: rump ? (0) matthew sporleder
01:53 rump ? (1) kamel derouiche
Wed, 13 Aug 2008
23:35 Re: rfc: C99 style of the uintN_t types (1) Valeriy E. Ushakov
21:51 Re: Including pf/altq in GENERIC? (0) Adam Hoka
21:23 Re: Including pf/altq in GENERIC? (0) Brian Buhrow
20:51 Re: Including pf/altq in GENERIC? (1) Thor Lancelot Simon
20:17 Including pf/altq in GENERIC? (1) Adam Hoka
18:22 Re: VOP_CREATE hanging (0) David Holland
11:52 Re: Xen 3.3: Problem HVM guest (1) Manuel Bouyer
11:41 Re: VOP_CREATE hanging (0) Antti Kantee
11:16 Re: VOP_CREATE hanging (2) Adam Burkepile
07:58 Re: Xen 3.3: Problem HVM guest (1) Christoph Egger
06:48 Re: Idea wanted; block disk on network (SC101T) (0) Toru Nishimura
06:05 Re: Xen 3.3: Problem HVM guest (0) Christoph Egger
06:01 Re: Idea wanted; block disk on network (SC101T) (1) Christoph Egger
05:57 Re: Xen 3.3: Problem HVM guest (1) Michael Litchard
03:40 Re: Idea wanted; block disk on network (SC101T) (2) Steven M. Bellovin
03:14 Re: Idea wanted; block disk on network (SC101T) (0) der Mouse
01:54 Re: Idea wanted; block disk on network (SC101T) (1) Steven M. Bellovin
01:40 Re: Idea wanted; block disk on network (SC101T) (0) Daniel Carosone
01:21 Idea wanted; block disk on network (SC101T) (3) Toru Nishimura
Tue, 12 Aug 2008
21:54 Re: Xen 3.3: Problem HVM guest (2) Christoph Egger
21:46 Xen 3.3: Problem HVM guest (1) Christoph Egger
20:37 Re: rfc: C99 style of the uintN_t types (0) Joerg Sonnenberger
20:31 Re: rfc: C99 style of the uintN_t types (1) Andy Shevchenko
20:26 Re: rfc: C99 style of the uintN_t types (0) Eric Haszlakiewicz
20:09 Re: rfc: C99 style of the uintN_t types (1) Bill Stouder-Studenmund
19:26 Re: rfc: C99 style of the uintN_t types (0) Peter Seebach
18:56 Re: rfc: C99 style of the uintN_t types (0) Jason Thorpe
18:46 Re: rfc: C99 style of the uintN_t types (1) James Chacon
18:38 Re: rfc: C99 style of the uintN_t types (3) Andy Shevchenko
18:32 Re: rfc: C99 style of the uintN_t types (1) Jason Thorpe
18:15 Re: rfc: C99 style of the uintN_t types (1) Thor Lancelot Simon
17:56 Re: GSoC - USB Video Class (UVC) webcam driver (0) Matthias Drochner
15:59 Re: VOP_CREATE hanging (0) David Holland
15:24 Re: Case insensitive FFS (0) Takahiro Kambe
15:14 Re: Case insensitive FFS (0) Antti Kantee
15:02 Re: VOP_CREATE hanging (2) Antti Kantee
14:40 VOP_CREATE hanging (1) Adam Burkepile
13:47 Re: rfc: C99 style of the uintN_t types (0) SODA Noriyuki
13:14 Re: rfc: C99 style of the uintN_t types (0) Joerg Sonnenberger
10:56 Re: rfc: C99 style of the uintN_t types (2) Andy Shevchenko
10:41 Re: rfc: C99 style of the uintN_t types (3) Valeriy E. Ushakov
10:26 rfc: C99 style of the uintN_t types (2) Andy Shevchenko
Mon, 11 Aug 2008
14:24 Re: wm problem, the dmesg output (0) Jukka Marin
Thu, 07 Aug 2008
16:57 Re: VOP_WRITE without vnode lock (0) David Holland
16:36 Re: Odd stacksize problem (0) Matthias Drochner
15:59 Re: VOP_WRITE without vnode lock (0) Juergen Hannken-Illjes
15:39 Re: VOP_WRITE without vnode lock (1) der Mouse
15:06 Re: IPLs - One too many? (0) Hiroyuki Bessho
11:07 Re: rfc: high-resolution timer framework (1) Alexander Shishkin
09:35 VOP_WRITE without vnode lock (2) Juergen Hannken-Illjes
03:18 Re: Case insensitive FFS (0) Daniel Carosone
03:09 Re: Case insensitive FFS (1) Bill Stouder-Studenmund
Wed, 06 Aug 2008
22:54 Odd stacksize problem (1) Adam Hoka
20:57 Re: Case insensitive FFS (1) Matthias Scheler
19:15 Re: rfc: high-resolution timer framework (0) Joerg Sonnenberger
18:59 Re: rfc: high-resolution timer framework (1) David Laight
16:38 Re: wm problem, the dmesg output (1) Jukka Marin
16:22 Re: Large memory with netbsd 4 (0) Paul Goyette
16:09 Re: Large memory with netbsd 4 (1) Izumi Tsutsui
15:52 Re: wm problem, the dmesg output (1) Manuel Bouyer
15:46 Re: Large memory with netbsd 4 (1) Paul Goyette
15:30 Re: Large memory with netbsd 4 (1) Joerg Sonnenberger
15:29 Re: wm problem, the dmesg output (1) Manuel Bouyer
15:19 Re: wm problem, the dmesg output (1) Jukka Marin
15:16 Re: Large memory with netbsd 4 (0) Manuel Bouyer
15:12 Re: Large memory with netbsd 4 (0) Brian Buhrow
15:03 Re: Large memory with netbsd 4 (1) Paul Goyette
14:53 Re: Large memory with netbsd 4 (1) Manuel Bouyer
14:48 Re: Case insensitive FFS (0) der Mouse
14:48 Re: WAPBL and backwards compatibility (0) Manuel Bouyer
14:32 Re: wm problem, the dmesg output (1) Manuel Bouyer
14:09 Re: Case insensitive FFS (0) Matthias Scheler
13:37 Re: Large memory with netbsd 4 (0) Steven M. Bellovin
13:24 Re: Case insensitive FFS (2) Greg Troxel
13:05 Re: interrupts & pmf/legacy shutdown hooks (was Re (0) Matthias Drochner
13:05 Re: Case insensitive FFS (1) Matthias Scheler
13:04 Re: Large memory with netbsd 4 (1) Joerg Sonnenberger
13:03 Re: Case insensitive FFS (1) Matthias Scheler
12:54 Re: Case insensitive FFS (0) SODA Noriyuki
12:45 Re: Case insensitive FFS (2) Greg Troxel
12:41 Re: Case insensitive FFS (1) Antti Kantee
12:38 Re: Case insensitive FFS (2) Martin Husemann
12:33 Re: Large memory with netbsd 4 (1) Matthias Scheler
12:15 Case insensitive FFS (4) Matthias Scheler
02:10 Re: interrupts & pmf/legacy shutdown hooks (was Re (1) Simon Burge
01:40 Re: Large memory with netbsd 4 (0) David Holland
Tue, 05 Aug 2008
23:36 Re: rfc: high-resolution timer framework (1) Joerg Sonnenberger
23:19 Re: rfc: high-resolution timer framework (1) David Laight
20:17 Re: rfc: high-resolution timer framework (1) Alexander Shishkin
18:34 Re: interrupts & pmf/legacy shutdown hooks (was Re (1) Matthias Drochner
18:05 interrupts & pmf/legacy shutdown hooks (was Re: CV (1) David Young
16:12 Large memory with netbsd 4 (0) Jean Praloran
15:46 Re: Large memory with netbsd 4 (1) Greg A. Woods; Planix, Inc.
15:19 Re: Large memory with netbsd 4 (1) juanito
15:18 Re: Large memory with netbsd 4 (2) Paul Goyette
15:02 Re: Large memory with netbsd 4 (2) Simon Burge
14:56 Large memory with netbsd 4 (2) juanito
05:14 re: cpu_need_resched(t_vp->l_cpu, RESCHED_IMMED) f (0) matthew green
05:01 cpu_need_resched(t_vp->l_cpu, RESCHED_IMMED) for N (1) Bill Stouder-Studenmund
03:38 Re: linux has added "close on exec" flags to lots (0) der Mouse
00:34 Re: rfc: POSIX conformance (0) Matt Thomas
Mon, 04 Aug 2008
22:24 Re: linux has added "close on exec" flags to lots (0) Steven M. Bellovin
21:41 Re: linux has added "close on exec" flags to lots (0) David Laight
21:39 Re: linux has added "close on exec" flags to lots (3) Love Hörnquist Åstrand
21:23 Re: VOP_ISLOCKED (0) Antti Kantee
21:09 VOP_ISLOCKED (1) Adam Burkepile
19:55 Re: linux has added "close on exec" flags to lots (0) Joerg Sonnenberger
19:49 Re: linux has added "close on exec" flags to lots (0) Ignatios Souvatzis
19:28 Re: linux has added "close on exec" flags to lots (1) Joerg Sonnenberger
19:08 Re: linux has added "close on exec" flags to lots (1) Perry E. Metzger
18:11 Re: linux has added "close on exec" flags to lots (0) Joerg Sonnenberger
18:06 Re: linux has added "close on exec" flags to lots (0) Perry E. Metzger
17:42 Re: rfc: POSIX conformance (0) Andy Shevchenko
17:36 Re: linux has added "close on exec" flags to lots (3) Steven M. Bellovin
17:19 Re: linux has added "close on exec" flags to lots (2) Joerg Sonnenberger
17:14 Re: linux has added "close on exec" flags to lots (1) Love Hörnquist Åstrand
17:10 Re: linux has added "close on exec" flags to lots (1) Joerg Sonnenberger
17:07 Re: linux has added "close on exec" flags to lots (0) Perry E. Metzger
17:01 Re: linux has added "close on exec" flags to lots (2) Joerg Sonnenberger
16:42 linux has added "close on exec" flags to lots of f (2) Perry E. Metzger
16:41 Re: wpi0 related kernel crashes (0) Joerg Sonnenberger
16:32 Re: wpi0 related kernel crashes (1) Steven M. Bellovin
16:04 Re: wpi0 related kernel crashes (1) Joerg Sonnenberger
16:00 Re: wpi0 related kernel crashes (0) Jared D. McNeill
15:36 Re: rfc: POSIX conformance (1) Peter Seebach
15:02 Re: rfc: POSIX conformance (0) Perry E. Metzger
13:59 wpi0 related kernel crashes (2) Berndt Josef Wulf
11:33 Re: rfc: POSIX conformance (1) Andy Shevchenko
11:08 Re: WAPBL and backwards compatibility (0) Perry E. Metzger
09:47 Re: rfc: POSIX conformance (1) Andy Shevchenko
08:15 Re: rfc: POSIX conformance (2) Peter Seebach
08:10 Re: rfc: POSIX conformance (1) Christos Zoulas
08:07 Re: rfc: POSIX conformance (0) Christos Zoulas
07:47 Re: rfc: POSIX conformance (1) Andy Shevchenko
07:03 Re: rfc: POSIX conformance (3) Andy Shevchenko
04:28 Re: WAPBL and backwards compatibility (0) David Holland
03:30 Re: WAPBL and backwards compatibility (1) Bill Stouder-Studenmund
Sun, 03 Aug 2008
15:36 Re: WAPBL and backwards compatibility (1) Perry E. Metzger
Sat, 02 Aug 2008
20:46 Re: WAPBL and backwards compatibility (0) Joerg Sonnenberger
04:01 Re: WAPBL and backwards compatibility (0) Jason Thorpe
04:00 Re: WAPBL and backwards compatibility (0) Jason Thorpe
Fri, 01 Aug 2008
22:51 Re: WAPBL and backwards compatibility (0) Bill Stouder-Studenmund
22:48 Re: WAPBL and backwards compatibility (0) Martin Husemann
22:26 Re: WAPBL and backwards compatibility (0) Bill Stouder-Studenmund
22:18 Re: rfc: POSIX conformance (1) Patrick Welche
20:22 Re: rfc: high-resolution timer framework (0) Christos Zoulas
19:13 Re: rfc: high-resolution timer framework (1) Andy Shevchenko
19:06 Re: rfc: high-resolution timer framework (1) Christos Zoulas
18:25 Re: rfc: high-resolution timer framework (1) Andy Shevchenko
17:35 Re: rfc: high-resolution timer framework (3) Christos Zoulas
15:48 Re: WAPBL and backwards compatibility (0) Greg A. Woods; Planix, Inc.
15:41 Re: WAPBL and backwards compatibility (2) Thor Lancelot Simon
15:26 Re: WAPBL and backwards compatibility (1) David Maxwell
15:24 Re: WAPBL and backwards compatibility (0) Adam Hamsik
14:54 Re: WAPBL and backwards compatibility (0) Michael Lorenz
14:52 Re: rfc: high-resolution timer framework (1) Alexander Shishkin
13:03 Re: rfc: POSIX conformance (1) Andy Shevchenko
09:48 Re: WAPBL and backwards compatibility (2) Martin Husemann
09:42 Re: IPLs - One too many? (0) Chris Gilbert
09:05 Re: WAPBL and backwards compatibility (3) Alan Barrett
08:26 Re: WAPBL and backwards compatibility (0) Chris Gilbert
08:01 rfc: POSIX conformance (1) Andy Shevchenko
07:22 WAPBL and backwards compatibility (9) Simon Burge


Page 1 of 2008/08
[Prev Page] [Newest Page] [Oldest Page] [Next Page]
Home


Mail converted by MHonArc