Re: Solved! (was: why is this needed?)

[David Young <dyoung%pobox.com@localhost>]

On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 09:06:14PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 01:57:09PM -0500, David Young wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 04:04:08PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
> > > While here, I removed the unneeded and empty gscpcib_childdetach  
> > > function.
> > 
> > The gscpcib_childdetach function, empty though it is, is needed so that
> > children can be detached.  Please put that back. :-)
> 
> Yes and no. config_detach works, but detachdevbyname rejects that.
> I am not sure if the latter is correct to do so.

I am sure that the latter is correct to do so. config_detach() should
probably require the parent to provide a child-detached routine, too,
but it's not necessary to discuss that before fixing the regression.

Dave

-- 
David Young             OJC Technologies
dyoung%ojctech.com@localhost      Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933