On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 09:06:14PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 01:57:09PM -0500, David Young wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 04:04:08PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
While here, I removed the unneeded and empty gscpcib_childdetach
function.
The gscpcib_childdetach function, empty though it is, is needed so
that
children can be detached. Please put that back. :-)
Yes and no. config_detach works, but detachdevbyname rejects that.
I am not sure if the latter is correct to do so.
I am sure that the latter is correct to do so. config_detach() should
probably require the parent to provide a child-detached routine, too,
but it's not necessary to discuss that before fixing the regression.