Re: libquota proposal

[David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 06:19:30PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
 > > > At this point, in the source 'quota1' is used for the old
 > > > quota format, 'quota2' for the new one and 'quota' for the few things
 > > > that are common.
 > > 
 > > Everything outside the kernel should be in the last category, though.
 > 
 > exept those that deal directly with the filesystem datas (edquota,
 > quotacheck, repquota for quota1, newfs, fsck_ffs, tunefs and fsdb for
 > quota2).

This is (part of) why it's important to distinguish the on-disk
structures from the FS-independent interface.

(also, edquota and repquota seem fs-independent to me...)

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost