tech-kern by date

Last updated: Sun Aug 04 15:53:08 2013
Messages in reverse chronological order
Timezone is UTC

Page 1 of 2011/03
[Prev Page] [Newest Page] [Oldest Page] [Next Page]

TimeSubject# followupsFrom
Thu, 31 Mar 2011
22:14 Re: "covering set" of PCI kernels? (0) Matt Thomas
21:43 Re: "covering set" of PCI kernels? (0) Paul Goyette
21:09 "covering set" of PCI kernels? (5) David Young
20:32 Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 (0) Thor Lancelot Simon
20:25 Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 (1) Julio Merino
20:11 filesystem writing inodes when it oughtn't? (2) Thor Lancelot Simon
19:53 Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 (2) Thor Lancelot Simon
09:21 netbsd at Dell M710 (0) 6bone
Wed, 30 Mar 2011
16:39 Re: fxp problems on amd64 (0) Adam K Kirchhoff
14:53 Re: fxp problems on amd64 (1) Jonathan A. Kollasch
14:41 Re: fxp problems on amd64 (1) Adam K Kirchhoff
Tue, 29 Mar 2011
21:39 fxp problems on amd64 (1) Adam K Kirchhoff
17:33 Re: GSoC 2011 project proposal [Add kqueue support (1) Jean-Yves Migeon
15:35 Re: GSoC 2011 project proposal [Add kqueue support (1) Julio Merino
15:17 Re: GSoC 2011 project proposal [Add kqueue support (2) David Young
09:42 Re: GSoC 2011 project proposal [Add kqueue support (2) Julio Merino
Mon, 28 Mar 2011
22:04 GSoC 2011 project proposal [Add kqueue support to (1) Dmitry Matveev
18:42 Re: GSoC project idea: posix_spawn (0) Martin Husemann
18:16 GSoC project idea: posix_spawn (1) Joerg Sonnenberger
14:07 Re: sysmon_pswitch_event(): provide a sleep routin (0) Jean-Yves Migeon
14:00 Re: rb_tree_find_node_leq (0) Tamas Toth
13:05 Re: sysmon_pswitch_event(): provide a sleep routin (1) Jukka Ruohonen
12:54 Re: sysmon_pswitch_event(): provide a sleep routin (1) Martin Husemann
12:50 Re: sysmon_pswitch_event(): provide a sleep routin (1) Jukka Ruohonen
12:47 rb_tree_find_node_leq (1) Tamas Toth
12:33 sysmon_pswitch_event(): provide a sleep routine wh (1) Jean-Yves Migeon
Sun, 27 Mar 2011
15:03 Re: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compatibili (0) Marc Balmer
Fri, 25 Mar 2011
22:49 re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 (0) matthew green
16:33 Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 (0) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
16:14 Re: Decomposing vfs_subr.c (0) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
14:38 Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 (1) Eduardo Horvath
14:26 Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 (1) Andrew Doran
07:16 Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 (1) Erik Fair
02:41 Re: Decomposing vfs_subr.c (1) David Holland
Thu, 24 Mar 2011
17:05 Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 (1) Thor Lancelot Simon
16:05 Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 (1) Eduardo Horvath
12:27 Re: libquota proposal (0) Manuel Bouyer
12:04 Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 (3) Andrew Doran
11:04 Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 (0) Christoph Egger
10:45 Re: libquota proposal (0) Manuel Bouyer
10:34 Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 (0) David Laight
09:56 Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 (0) Christoph Egger
05:55 Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 (0) der Mouse
03:13 Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 (1) Jukka Ruohonen
01:36 Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 (0) Dennis Ferguson
01:20 Re: libquota proposal (1) David Holland
00:28 Re: libquota proposal (0) David Holland
00:22 Re: libquota proposal (0) David Holland
00:19 Re: libquota proposal (1) David Holland
Wed, 23 Mar 2011
23:53 Re: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compatibili (0) Andrew Doran
22:13 Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 (0) David Laight
22:07 Re: Decomposing vfs_subr.c (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
21:40 Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 (0) Eduardo Horvath
21:24 high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24-cor (9) Thor Lancelot Simon
18:17 Re: Decomposing vfs_subr.c (1) David Holland
16:11 Re: libquota proposal (1) Manuel Bouyer
16:10 Re: libquota proposal (1) Manuel Bouyer
15:45 Re: libquota proposal (1) David Holland
15:43 Re: libquota proposal (1) David Holland
15:06 Re: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compatibili (3) Joerg Sonnenberger
14:36 Re: inheriting the lwp private area (0) Andrew Doran
14:19 Re: inheriting the lwp private area (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
14:18 Re: Decomposing vfs_subr.c (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
14:04 Re: inheriting the lwp private area (1) Andrew Doran
13:51 Re: Decomposing vfs_subr.c (1) Andrew Doran
08:51 Re: libquota proposal (1) Manuel Bouyer
08:50 Re: libquota proposal (1) Manuel Bouyer
07:53 Re: inheriting the lwp private area (1) Matt Thomas
04:07 Decomposing vfs_subr.c (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
03:51 inheriting the lwp private area (1) Antti Kantee
03:45 Re: libquota proposal (1) David Holland
03:45 Re: libquota proposal (1) David Holland
Tue, 22 Mar 2011
16:42 Re: libquota proposal (1) Manuel Bouyer
16:19 Re: libquota proposal (1) Christos Zoulas
15:39 Re: virtualized nfsd (Re: virtual kernels, syscall (0) Antti Kantee
14:39 Re: rump is complete (0) Alistair Crooks
14:28 Re: rump is complete (0) Antti Kantee
14:21 Re: libquota proposal (1) Manuel Bouyer
13:10 Re: libquota proposal (2) David Holland
10:34 Re: rump is complete (1) Stephen Borrill
05:47 Re: rump is complete (2) Christoph Egger
Mon, 21 Mar 2011
22:45 Re: rump is complete (0) Antti Kantee
21:05 Re: rump is complete (1) Sanjay Lal
19:33 Re: libquota proposal (0) Christos Zoulas
19:29 Re: libquota proposal (1) Manuel Bouyer
19:22 Re: rump is complete (0) Jean-Yves Migeon
19:22 Re: libquota proposal (1) Christos Zoulas
16:25 Re: libquota proposal (1) Manuel Bouyer
15:59 Re: rump is complete (0) Stefano Marinelli
15:47 Re: libquota proposal (1) Christos Zoulas
15:45 rump is complete (4) Antti Kantee
15:34 Re: gsoc idea: xmlif (0) Antti Kantee
13:21 Re: libquota proposal (2) Manuel Bouyer
13:18 Re: libquota proposal (1) David Holland
01:09 Re: expansion into 64-bit dev_t space (0) Darren Reed
01:07 Re: expansion into 64-bit dev_t space (1) Christos Zoulas
Sun, 20 Mar 2011
21:30 expansion into 64-bit dev_t space (1) Jonathan A. Kollasch
21:09 gsoc idea: xmlif (1) Vladimir Kirillov
11:47 Re: bouyer-quota2: fsck_ffs crash (0) Manuel Bouyer
Sat, 19 Mar 2011
18:16 Re: libquota proposal (0) Manuel Bouyer
18:07 Re: libquota proposal (2) Christos Zoulas
17:19 Re: libquota proposal (1) Manuel Bouyer
17:14 Re: libquota proposal (1) David Holland
16:45 Re: libquota proposal (2) Manuel Bouyer
15:35 Re: libquota proposal (1) Christos Zoulas
12:09 Re: libquota proposal (0) Manuel Bouyer
12:01 re: libquota proposal (1) matthew green
11:24 Re: libquota proposal (1) Manuel Bouyer
10:45 Re: libquota proposal (1) Manuel Bouyer
Fri, 18 Mar 2011
22:40 re: libquota proposal (1) matthew green
22:03 re: partitionSizeHi in raidframe component label, (0) matthew green
20:11 libquota proposal (2) Manuel Bouyer
14:23 Re: partitionSizeHi in raidframe component label, (1) Greg Oster
09:57 re: partitionSizeHi in raidframe component label, (1) matthew green
05:32 re: partitionSizeHi in raidframe component label, (1) matthew green
Sun, 13 Mar 2011
06:20 Re: USB printing panic (0) Bill Green
Sat, 12 Mar 2011
22:43 Re: the bouyer-quota2 branch (0) Manuel Bouyer
Fri, 11 Mar 2011
09:22 Re: bouyer-quota2: fsck_ffs crash (0) Martin Husemann
08:44 Re: the bouyer-quota2 branch (0) Manuel Bouyer
04:09 re: the bouyer-quota2 branch (1) matthew green
Thu, 10 Mar 2011
19:06 Re: bouyer-quota2: fsck_ffs crash (0) Eduardo Horvath
18:50 Re: bouyer-quota2: fsck_ffs crash (0) Manuel Bouyer
18:48 Re: bouyer-quota2: fsck_ffs crash (0) Antti Kantee
18:45 Re: bouyer-quota2: fsck_ffs crash (4) Manuel Bouyer
18:41 Re: the bouyer-quota2 branch (1) Manuel Bouyer
18:00 Re: the bouyer-quota2 branch (1) David Holland
17:59 bouyer-quota2: fsck_ffs crash (2) Ignatios Souvatzis
13:15 Hello (0) warlocknn
11:42 Re: the bouyer-quota2 branch (1) Manuel Bouyer
11:11 Re: the bouyer-quota2 branch (0) Antti Kantee
10:53 re: the bouyer-quota2 branch (1) matthew green
10:29 Re: the bouyer-quota2 branch (2) Manuel Bouyer
09:41 Re: the bouyer-quota2 branch (0) Antti Kantee
09:30 re: the bouyer-quota2 branch (1) matthew green
09:01 Re: the bouyer-quota2 branch (2) Antti Kantee
08:36 Re: the bouyer-quota2 branch (1) Manuel Bouyer
00:42 re: the bouyer-quota2 branch (1) matthew green
Wed, 09 Mar 2011
22:18 Re: the bouyer-quota2 branch (1) Antti Kantee
19:20 Re: the bouyer-quota2 branch (1) Manuel Bouyer
18:28 Re: the bouyer-quota2 branch (1) David Holland
Tue, 08 Mar 2011
22:10 Re: Bad threading performance (0) Sad Clouds
22:03 Re: Bad threading performance (0) Sad Clouds
21:22 Re: Bad threading performance (1) Andrew Doran
18:37 Re: Bad threading performance (1) Witold Wnuk
17:20 Re: Bad threading performance (2) Sad Clouds
05:46 Re: IEEE80211_IOC_MLME ioctl failure (0) David Young
Mon, 07 Mar 2011
18:39 Bad threading performance (1) Sad Clouds
12:07 Re: the bouyer-quota2 branch (1) Manuel Bouyer
10:54 Re: IEEE80211_IOC_MLME ioctl failure (0) Christoph Egger
09:37 Re: the bouyer-quota2 branch (1) David Holland
Fri, 04 Mar 2011
08:56 Re: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compatibili (0) Stephen Borrill
08:21 Re: IEEE80211_IOC_MLME ioctl failure (2) Christoph Egger
Thu, 03 Mar 2011
17:09 Re: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compatibili (1) Matthew Mondor
11:01 Re: Fwd: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compat (0) David Holland
Wed, 02 Mar 2011
20:15 Re: ps_strings refactoring & compat32 fix (0) Paul Goyette
19:32 ps_strings refactoring & compat32 fix (1) Joerg Sonnenberger
01:36 Re: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compatibili (0) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
00:40 Re: Fwd: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compat (2) Andrew Doran
00:25 Re: Fwd: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compat (0) Andrew Doran
Tue, 01 Mar 2011
16:21 Re: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compatibili (0) Manuel Bouyer
10:21 Re: Fwd: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compat (0) haad
10:07 Re: Fwd: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compat (1) Antti Kantee
09:55 Re: Fwd: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compat (2) Andrew Doran
01:08 Re: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compatibili (0) Takahiro Kambe
01:05 Re: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compatibili (2) Brian Buhrow
00:26 Re: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compatibili (0) Takahiro Kambe


Page 1 of 2011/03
[Prev Page] [Newest Page] [Oldest Page] [Next Page]
Home


Mail converted by MHonArc