Time | Subject | # followups | From |
Thu, 31 Mar 2011 |
22:14 |
Re: "covering set" of PCI kernels? |
(0) |
Matt Thomas |
21:43 |
Re: "covering set" of PCI kernels? |
(0) |
Paul Goyette |
21:09 |
"covering set" of PCI kernels? |
(5) |
David Young |
20:32 |
Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 |
(0) |
Thor Lancelot Simon |
20:25 |
Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 |
(1) |
Julio Merino |
20:11 |
filesystem writing inodes when it oughtn't? |
(2) |
Thor Lancelot Simon |
19:53 |
Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 |
(2) |
Thor Lancelot Simon |
09:21 |
netbsd at Dell M710 |
(0) |
6bone |
Wed, 30 Mar 2011 |
16:39 |
Re: fxp problems on amd64 |
(0) |
Adam K Kirchhoff |
14:53 |
Re: fxp problems on amd64 |
(1) |
Jonathan A. Kollasch |
14:41 |
Re: fxp problems on amd64 |
(1) |
Adam K Kirchhoff |
Tue, 29 Mar 2011 |
21:39 |
fxp problems on amd64 |
(1) |
Adam K Kirchhoff |
17:33 |
Re: GSoC 2011 project proposal [Add kqueue support |
(1) |
Jean-Yves Migeon |
15:35 |
Re: GSoC 2011 project proposal [Add kqueue support |
(1) |
Julio Merino |
15:17 |
Re: GSoC 2011 project proposal [Add kqueue support |
(2) |
David Young |
09:42 |
Re: GSoC 2011 project proposal [Add kqueue support |
(2) |
Julio Merino |
Mon, 28 Mar 2011 |
22:04 |
GSoC 2011 project proposal [Add kqueue support to |
(1) |
Dmitry Matveev |
18:42 |
Re: GSoC project idea: posix_spawn |
(0) |
Martin Husemann |
18:16 |
GSoC project idea: posix_spawn |
(1) |
Joerg Sonnenberger |
14:07 |
Re: sysmon_pswitch_event(): provide a sleep routin |
(0) |
Jean-Yves Migeon |
14:00 |
Re: rb_tree_find_node_leq |
(0) |
Tamas Toth |
13:05 |
Re: sysmon_pswitch_event(): provide a sleep routin |
(1) |
Jukka Ruohonen |
12:54 |
Re: sysmon_pswitch_event(): provide a sleep routin |
(1) |
Martin Husemann |
12:50 |
Re: sysmon_pswitch_event(): provide a sleep routin |
(1) |
Jukka Ruohonen |
12:47 |
rb_tree_find_node_leq |
(1) |
Tamas Toth |
12:33 |
sysmon_pswitch_event(): provide a sleep routine wh |
(1) |
Jean-Yves Migeon |
Sun, 27 Mar 2011 |
15:03 |
Re: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compatibili |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 |
22:49 |
re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 |
(0) |
matthew green |
16:33 |
Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 |
(0) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
16:14 |
Re: Decomposing vfs_subr.c |
(0) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
14:38 |
Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 |
(1) |
Eduardo Horvath |
14:26 |
Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 |
(1) |
Andrew Doran |
07:16 |
Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 |
(1) |
Erik Fair |
02:41 |
Re: Decomposing vfs_subr.c |
(1) |
David Holland |
Thu, 24 Mar 2011 |
17:05 |
Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 |
(1) |
Thor Lancelot Simon |
16:05 |
Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 |
(1) |
Eduardo Horvath |
12:27 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
12:04 |
Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 |
(3) |
Andrew Doran |
11:04 |
Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 |
(0) |
Christoph Egger |
10:45 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
10:34 |
Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 |
(0) |
David Laight |
09:56 |
Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 |
(0) |
Christoph Egger |
05:55 |
Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 |
(0) |
der Mouse |
03:13 |
Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 |
(1) |
Jukka Ruohonen |
01:36 |
Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 |
(0) |
Dennis Ferguson |
01:20 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(1) |
David Holland |
00:28 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(0) |
David Holland |
00:22 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(0) |
David Holland |
00:19 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(1) |
David Holland |
Wed, 23 Mar 2011 |
23:53 |
Re: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compatibili |
(0) |
Andrew Doran |
22:13 |
Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 |
(0) |
David Laight |
22:07 |
Re: Decomposing vfs_subr.c |
(1) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
21:40 |
Re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24 |
(0) |
Eduardo Horvath |
21:24 |
high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24-cor |
(9) |
Thor Lancelot Simon |
18:17 |
Re: Decomposing vfs_subr.c |
(1) |
David Holland |
16:11 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
16:10 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
15:45 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(1) |
David Holland |
15:43 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(1) |
David Holland |
15:06 |
Re: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compatibili |
(3) |
Joerg Sonnenberger |
14:36 |
Re: inheriting the lwp private area |
(0) |
Andrew Doran |
14:19 |
Re: inheriting the lwp private area |
(1) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
14:18 |
Re: Decomposing vfs_subr.c |
(1) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
14:04 |
Re: inheriting the lwp private area |
(1) |
Andrew Doran |
13:51 |
Re: Decomposing vfs_subr.c |
(1) |
Andrew Doran |
08:51 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
08:50 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
07:53 |
Re: inheriting the lwp private area |
(1) |
Matt Thomas |
04:07 |
Decomposing vfs_subr.c |
(1) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
03:51 |
inheriting the lwp private area |
(1) |
Antti Kantee |
03:45 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(1) |
David Holland |
03:45 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(1) |
David Holland |
Tue, 22 Mar 2011 |
16:42 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
16:19 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(1) |
Christos Zoulas |
15:39 |
Re: virtualized nfsd (Re: virtual kernels, syscall |
(0) |
Antti Kantee |
14:39 |
Re: rump is complete |
(0) |
Alistair Crooks |
14:28 |
Re: rump is complete |
(0) |
Antti Kantee |
14:21 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
13:10 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(2) |
David Holland |
10:34 |
Re: rump is complete |
(1) |
Stephen Borrill |
05:47 |
Re: rump is complete |
(2) |
Christoph Egger |
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 |
22:45 |
Re: rump is complete |
(0) |
Antti Kantee |
21:05 |
Re: rump is complete |
(1) |
Sanjay Lal |
19:33 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(0) |
Christos Zoulas |
19:29 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
19:22 |
Re: rump is complete |
(0) |
Jean-Yves Migeon |
19:22 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(1) |
Christos Zoulas |
16:25 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
15:59 |
Re: rump is complete |
(0) |
Stefano Marinelli |
15:47 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(1) |
Christos Zoulas |
15:45 |
rump is complete |
(4) |
Antti Kantee |
15:34 |
Re: gsoc idea: xmlif |
(0) |
Antti Kantee |
13:21 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(2) |
Manuel Bouyer |
13:18 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(1) |
David Holland |
01:09 |
Re: expansion into 64-bit dev_t space |
(0) |
Darren Reed |
01:07 |
Re: expansion into 64-bit dev_t space |
(1) |
Christos Zoulas |
Sun, 20 Mar 2011 |
21:30 |
expansion into 64-bit dev_t space |
(1) |
Jonathan A. Kollasch |
21:09 |
gsoc idea: xmlif |
(1) |
Vladimir Kirillov |
11:47 |
Re: bouyer-quota2: fsck_ffs crash |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
Sat, 19 Mar 2011 |
18:16 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
18:07 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(2) |
Christos Zoulas |
17:19 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
17:14 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(1) |
David Holland |
16:45 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(2) |
Manuel Bouyer |
15:35 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(1) |
Christos Zoulas |
12:09 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
12:01 |
re: libquota proposal |
(1) |
matthew green |
11:24 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
10:45 |
Re: libquota proposal |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
Fri, 18 Mar 2011 |
22:40 |
re: libquota proposal |
(1) |
matthew green |
22:03 |
re: partitionSizeHi in raidframe component label, |
(0) |
matthew green |
20:11 |
libquota proposal |
(2) |
Manuel Bouyer |
14:23 |
Re: partitionSizeHi in raidframe component label, |
(1) |
Greg Oster |
09:57 |
re: partitionSizeHi in raidframe component label, |
(1) |
matthew green |
05:32 |
re: partitionSizeHi in raidframe component label, |
(1) |
matthew green |
Sun, 13 Mar 2011 |
06:20 |
Re: USB printing panic |
(0) |
Bill Green |
Sat, 12 Mar 2011 |
22:43 |
Re: the bouyer-quota2 branch |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
Fri, 11 Mar 2011 |
09:22 |
Re: bouyer-quota2: fsck_ffs crash |
(0) |
Martin Husemann |
08:44 |
Re: the bouyer-quota2 branch |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
04:09 |
re: the bouyer-quota2 branch |
(1) |
matthew green |
Thu, 10 Mar 2011 |
19:06 |
Re: bouyer-quota2: fsck_ffs crash |
(0) |
Eduardo Horvath |
18:50 |
Re: bouyer-quota2: fsck_ffs crash |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
18:48 |
Re: bouyer-quota2: fsck_ffs crash |
(0) |
Antti Kantee |
18:45 |
Re: bouyer-quota2: fsck_ffs crash |
(4) |
Manuel Bouyer |
18:41 |
Re: the bouyer-quota2 branch |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
18:00 |
Re: the bouyer-quota2 branch |
(1) |
David Holland |
17:59 |
bouyer-quota2: fsck_ffs crash |
(2) |
Ignatios Souvatzis |
13:15 |
Hello |
(0) |
warlocknn |
11:42 |
Re: the bouyer-quota2 branch |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
11:11 |
Re: the bouyer-quota2 branch |
(0) |
Antti Kantee |
10:53 |
re: the bouyer-quota2 branch |
(1) |
matthew green |
10:29 |
Re: the bouyer-quota2 branch |
(2) |
Manuel Bouyer |
09:41 |
Re: the bouyer-quota2 branch |
(0) |
Antti Kantee |
09:30 |
re: the bouyer-quota2 branch |
(1) |
matthew green |
09:01 |
Re: the bouyer-quota2 branch |
(2) |
Antti Kantee |
08:36 |
Re: the bouyer-quota2 branch |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
00:42 |
re: the bouyer-quota2 branch |
(1) |
matthew green |
Wed, 09 Mar 2011 |
22:18 |
Re: the bouyer-quota2 branch |
(1) |
Antti Kantee |
19:20 |
Re: the bouyer-quota2 branch |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
18:28 |
Re: the bouyer-quota2 branch |
(1) |
David Holland |
Tue, 08 Mar 2011 |
22:10 |
Re: Bad threading performance |
(0) |
Sad Clouds |
22:03 |
Re: Bad threading performance |
(0) |
Sad Clouds |
21:22 |
Re: Bad threading performance |
(1) |
Andrew Doran |
18:37 |
Re: Bad threading performance |
(1) |
Witold Wnuk |
17:20 |
Re: Bad threading performance |
(2) |
Sad Clouds |
05:46 |
Re: IEEE80211_IOC_MLME ioctl failure |
(0) |
David Young |
Mon, 07 Mar 2011 |
18:39 |
Bad threading performance |
(1) |
Sad Clouds |
12:07 |
Re: the bouyer-quota2 branch |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
10:54 |
Re: IEEE80211_IOC_MLME ioctl failure |
(0) |
Christoph Egger |
09:37 |
Re: the bouyer-quota2 branch |
(1) |
David Holland |
Fri, 04 Mar 2011 |
08:56 |
Re: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compatibili |
(0) |
Stephen Borrill |
08:21 |
Re: IEEE80211_IOC_MLME ioctl failure |
(2) |
Christoph Egger |
Thu, 03 Mar 2011 |
17:09 |
Re: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compatibili |
(1) |
Matthew Mondor |
11:01 |
Re: Fwd: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compat |
(0) |
David Holland |
Wed, 02 Mar 2011 |
20:15 |
Re: ps_strings refactoring & compat32 fix |
(0) |
Paul Goyette |
19:32 |
ps_strings refactoring & compat32 fix |
(1) |
Joerg Sonnenberger |
01:36 |
Re: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compatibili |
(0) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
00:40 |
Re: Fwd: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compat |
(2) |
Andrew Doran |
00:25 |
Re: Fwd: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compat |
(0) |
Andrew Doran |
Tue, 01 Mar 2011 |
16:21 |
Re: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compatibili |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
10:21 |
Re: Fwd: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compat |
(0) |
haad |
10:07 |
Re: Fwd: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compat |
(1) |
Antti Kantee |
09:55 |
Re: Fwd: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compat |
(2) |
Andrew Doran |
01:08 |
Re: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compatibili |
(0) |
Takahiro Kambe |
01:05 |
Re: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compatibili |
(2) |
Brian Buhrow |
00:26 |
Re: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compatibili |
(0) |
Takahiro Kambe |